The smart Trick of h4831sc load data That No One is Discussing
The smart Trick of h4831sc load data That No One is Discussing
Blog Article
Given that there won't seem like any "Formal" Load Data on the market for this Load, can a number of you deliver a place to begin with this mixture and items to think about when Performing this Load up?
Of course, the Hodgdon tech would not endorse my mixing of various good deal quantities, but I believe I realize why. It's a litigation-pushed environment, and several fool would definitely deduce that he could blend H380 and H110 and think of his own customized mixture of powder. What a planet.
Liberalism; The not possible nonetheless recognized Idea that it is completely feasible to select up a turd from the thoroughly clean finish.
243, and some of the loads I've started off with include, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I am going to shoot the IMR7828 loads 1st, followed by the W780 loads just so there won't be any surprises in the event the H-4831sc loads exhibit a shotgun pattern! Who is aware of, I just may discover a use for it In the end.
INgunner54 mentioned: It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Identified a node and shot some teams.
It is really possible that no further dialogue is required, in which case we suggest beginning a fresh thread. If nonetheless you are feeling your response is needed it is possible to still do so.
i've employed equally and utilised the exact same expenses and also have not been in a position to explain to any noticable variances with functionality. the SC Edition meters just a little smoother is about all. any remarks??
and you might want to invest in some new load data textbooks. powder composition and chemistry can does improve over the years. 4831 powder of a long time in the past just isn't exact as precisely what is now available. that is certainly why a person seriously interested in reloading properly could have quite possibly the most current load data books to make reference to.
I have identified the precise opposite being true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and equally correct powder h4831sc in my 300 Earn Mag.
Ballistically, this Serious Extruded powder is the exact duplicate of H4831. Physically, it's a shorter grain size, therefore, the designation SC or limited cut. The shorter, additional compact kernels allow the powder to move with the powder steps extra effortlessly, helping to reduce the constant reducing of granules.
Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, They are wholly different powders, with IMR 4831 being substantially quicker compared to Hodgdon variants. Will not take care of them as the exact same powder, since they most certainly aren't.
I take advantage of 52 grs h4831 vs h4831sc H4831sc having a 117gr Hornady BTSP. It is precise, mild mannered, and knocks whitetails down DRT. If it had been me, I'd personally commence at fifty two gr and perform up.
arkansas or ohio i hardly ever noticed a distinction aside from h4831 vs h4831sc the normal is like rolling cordwood on to the the pan.
I found that my 7mag 160 partitions were being sub MOA with 4831sc with very low to min fees. I’m speaking 2700 (it's possible 2800) fps, it had been a minimal 60s grain charge inside of a Norma scenario. Not what I was looking for, but precise Nevertheless.